.png "Global Insight")
The oil is flowing again — but the bill for moving it is unlike anything the energy world has ever seen. Middle East oil exports have climbed back above pre-war levels, the Financial Times reported, even as Iranian attacks on tankers hit their most violent stretch of the conflict. The catch: getting a barrel of Gulf crude to Asia now costs more than five times what it did before the war.
This is one of the strangest recoveries in modern energy history — volume has returned, but normality has not. Here's what the data shows.
The numbers: 24.6 million barrels a day
According to the Financial Times, citing vessel-tracking data from Kpler, shipments from Gulf producers (excluding Iran) averaged 24.6 million barrels per day in the week ending October 18 — above the pre-war average of 23.3 million barrels a day, and the highest seven-day average since mid-February, just before the US and Israel struck Iran. As the New York Post reported, that means more oil is now leaving the region than before the war began.
But the headline masks a critical split. Oil moving through the Strait of Hormuz itself is still more than a third below pre-war levels, the FT's data shows — the recovery has been built on everything around the strait. Iran's own exports remain near zero under the US blockade, a stark exception to the regional rebound.
Why a barrel of oil now costs $37 just to ship
The International Energy Agency published a striking analysis this week: the cost of shipping crude from the Middle East Gulf to Asia has surged past $37 per barrel by mid-October — more than five times pre-war levels, with tanker rates hitting historic highs in September and climbing further this month, according to gCaptain.
Do the math on a single supertanker. A very large crude carrier (VLCC) holds about 2 million barrels. At today's rates, one cargo costs more than $74 million in freight alone — compared with less than $15 million before the conflict. War-risk insurance now runs up to 10% of a vessel's hull value per transit, against under 3% before the war.
The mechanism keeping the oil moving is an improvised logistics system operating under US military protection: expanded Saudi and UAE pipelines to terminals outside the strait (the East–West pipeline to Yanbu, the UAE line to Fujairah), short-haul tanker shuttles hugging the Omani coast, and ship-to-ship transfers in the Gulf of Oman. Before the war, about 17% of regional crude bypassed Hormuz; by September that share had climbed to 40%, per Kpler. More than 70% of the crude that still crosses Hormuz now changes tankers offshore near Fujairah or Sohar, Gulf News reported.
What it means for prices — and who pays
The cost lands somewhere between the producer and the driver. Brent crude traded around $108–110 a barrel on Wednesday, its highest since May, as October became the most violent month on the strait since March — about 30 vessel attacks so far this month, per maritime security reports. Kpler estimates traders can earn an extra $20 a barrel reselling Iraqi crude versus before the war, while crews are offered hazard bonuses of two to three times normal pay to make the crossings.
Refined products tell a darker story: Middle East refined-product exports are running at just 40% of pre-war levels, and Qatar's LNG exports remain hobbled after missile damage at Ras Laffan knocked out roughly 17% of capacity. This is the same Hormuz chokepoint where tankers were hit by mines earlier this month — part of Iran's pressure playbook around the strait. And with new gas projects racing ahead elsewhere, the world's energy map is being redrawn around who can move fuel without crossing a war zone.
The recovery proves the market can route around a blockade — at a price. Every extra dollar of freight is a tax the whole system pays, and it is showing up in refiner margins across Asia. The oil is flowing. The era of cheap oil shipping is over.
Follow Global Insight for clear explainers on the business stories moving markets.