A 44-year-old California woman has been charged with automobile homicide after a crash on a Utah interstate that killed a 66-year-old man — and, according to prosecutors, the most damning evidence in the case is not on the road at all. It is on her phone.
Christine Chao of Rosemead, California, was charged on October 20 in Utah's 4th District Court with second-degree felony automobile homicide while using a handheld device. The charge follows a three-vehicle collision on June 12, 2026, on northbound Interstate 15 near Levan, Utah — a crash investigators say she never even tried to stop.
What happened on I-15
Traffic on the interstate had slowed for a construction zone when Chao, driving a blue SUV, approached from behind. According to the charging documents, her vehicle struck a white sedan travelling ahead at reduced speed. The force of the impact pushed the sedan into a black SUV in front of it, and all three vehicles were forced off the roadway.
Scott LaVar Lichfield, 66, of Fillmore, Utah, was a passenger in one of the vehicles. He suffered a head injury and later died, according to the Utah Highway Patrol.
Responding officers noted a detail that immediately stood out: there were no brake marks on the road to indicate that Chao had slowed her vehicle before the collision. Chao reportedly told officers at the scene that she was at fault.
The phone evidence
Investigators obtained a warrant to search Chao's phone. According to the charging documents, a forensic examination found that the phone had accessed an adult website less than two minutes before the impact.
That timing is the core of the prosecution's case. Utah law treats causing a death while using a handheld device as a distinct, more serious form of automobile homicide — and the phone records, prosecutors argue, show the driver was looking at her screen instead of the slowing traffic ahead of her.
It is important to be clear about what has and has not been established. Chao has been charged, not convicted. Phone records showing a website was accessed shortly before a crash do not by themselves prove exactly what the driver was looking at in the final seconds, and she remains entitled to the presumption of innocence unless prosecutors prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. Her initial court appearance was scheduled for November 17, 2026.
Why this case matters beyond Utah
Distracted driving is one of the most stubborn road-safety problems in the United States. Drink-driving, by contrast, has been the target of decades of enforcement, public campaigns and technology — ignition interlocks, roadside testing, strict sentencing — and drivers broadly understand the risk. Phone distraction has never received the same treatment, even though a driver looking at a screen is, for those seconds, effectively driving blind.
This case makes that abstract danger concrete. The traffic ahead had already slowed. The construction zone was visible. Other drivers had adjusted. One driver, prosecutors say, did not — because her attention was elsewhere. The absence of brake marks tells the story in a way no witness could: there was no last-second realisation, no swerve, no attempt to stop. The crash happened because the driver never saw it coming.
That is also why the charge itself matters. Most distracted-driving cases end as traffic citations, even when the consequences are serious. A felony automobile homicide charge — built on phone forensics rather than on a breath test — signals that prosecutors are willing to treat screen distraction with the same gravity as drink-driving when someone dies. If the charge holds, it could become a reference point for similar cases across the country.
For drivers, the lesson is simpler and older than any law. A phone can wait. A construction zone cannot. The two seconds it takes to glance at a screen are, at highway speed, roughly the length of a football field travelled blind — and in this case, prosecutors say, those two seconds were the difference between a slowed queue of traffic and a funeral.
Read also: Florida Learjet Crash in Palm Beach Kills 9
Read also: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Admits Affair, Board Probe Spy Claims
Sources: Mothership, Times Now World
